The Honolulu Star Bulletin wrote:
"The state's financial picture is worse than thought, according to the Lingle administration, which said today it has discovered a clerical error that mistakenly boosted the state's general fund revenues by $44 million."
The Honolulu Advertiser wrote:
"Gov. Linda Lingle today announced that there was an overstatement of general fund revenues for the fiscal year that ended on June 30, 2009 (FY09). Actual general fund revenues were found to be $44 million below the amount reported by the state's Financial and Accounting Management Information System (FAMIS)."
Both newspapers quoted Governor Lingle's comments:
"With the recent discovery of the recording error, we have an additional $36.8 million shortfall, and the need for immediate solutions to close the budget gap becomes more urgent than ever," Lingle said. "The administration is committed to continue working toward this goal."
I guess the question is, "What happens next?" I'm afraid to think what the options are. I haven't heard anything yet but it can't be good.
How did things get so bad? Where did we go wrong? It seems not long ago everyone was bragging about how good the economy was. How Hawaii was the leader on so many fronts. We were giving away tax credits and corporate incentives. We seemed to be so "rich" and now, we are so "poor." In fact, some would argue that we could be facing bankruptcy. If we were a business, we would be done.
So, where do we go from here? More furloughs and layoffs? Tax increases? More sacrifices by the common folks? Whatever it is, I can assure you that it won't be pretty. We will be asked to pay the price for years of wasteful spending and a growing government. Is this fair? I think not!! God bless us all.
Wednesday, September 30, 2009
Monday, September 28, 2009
Hawaii Teachers Union Officials Stick by Friday-furloughs Decision
I was going to blog on another topic today, but after reading yesterday's article (with the same title as this post) in the Honolulu Advertiser, I decided to voice my serious concerns. Am I the only one that feels that Hawaii's children are being left behind? By the looks of the online comments, I don't think so. In fact, I believe that the vast majority of this State is disappointed with the actions of the Administration and the HSTA. What are they doing? Why are they not acting in the best interest of the children. Here are some excerpts, along with my comments, from the article:
"Hawaii State Teachers Association president Wil Okabe said that opting for furloughs on Fridays makes sense because of the substantial savings that will be gained and the need to be consistent with potential furlough days chosen by other state worker unions."
Makes sense? How does this make sense? Oh, I see. It is about savings and the need to be consistent with the other State worker unions. Childrens' education takes a back seat.
"The union and state could have prevented the loss of instructional days if they had scheduled furloughs on holidays and teacher planning days."
Now this makes sense!!
"Okabe added that most of a school's administrative or support staff are members of two other unions — the Hawaii Government Employee Association or the United Public Workers. If the HSTA had chosen a furlough day other than Friday, it would have made for a logistical nightmare, Okabe said."
Logistical nightmare versus our childrens' education. I would say that this is a no-brainer. I guess the HSTA president feels otherwise. We pay a lot of money for salaries of employees that are tasked with managing logistics. Nightmare? What about the fact that our children will be losing out? That's a nightmare.
"Marie Laderta, the state's chief negotiator, said the DOE did not have to schedule furloughs on instructional days. It could have opted for teacher pay cuts or made use of holidays, she said."
Then why did the State allow this to happen? Doesn't the State have to agree to the negotiated contract? Please stop the finger pointing, Ms. Laderta.
"Garrett Toguchi, chairman of the state Board of Education, said that the use of teacher planning days and professional development days were discussed, but ultimately those at the bargaining table decided against using them as furloughs."
Why??? Please tell us why!
"Toguchi said taking away the six noninstructional days from teachers would mean less time to plan curriculum and create strategies for boosting achievement."
Less time to plan curriculum and create strategies for 17 less days of instruction? Come on Mr. Toguchi. Do you really expect us to believe this?
" 'We demand a lot from our educators and put a lot of pressure on them to raise student achievement, raise test scores. ... Our educators need that time to get training, do planning and identify the needs of their students,' Toguchi said."
So are you saying that the way to raise student achievement and test scores is to reduce the number of instructional days for the students? Is that what you are saying? If so, please explain how you plan to do that.
"Okabe said the HSTA had considered using noninstructional days as furlough days, but those days would not have resulted in the kinds of cost savings that the state Department of Education was looking for."
So the HSTA and the Department of Education, who are tasked with educating the children of our State, have taken the position that cost savings is more important than education. This is quite evident by the quote of Mr. Okabe.
The actions of the leadership of this State is shameful. What is even more shameful is the lack of opposition from our legislators. Other than some meaningless comments, nothing is being done to address this very serious issue. Let's all band together and call for immediate action by our leaders. We must not let this happen to our children. Call your legislators, both local and State. Let them know how you feel. We don't have much time. Thank you.
"Hawaii State Teachers Association president Wil Okabe said that opting for furloughs on Fridays makes sense because of the substantial savings that will be gained and the need to be consistent with potential furlough days chosen by other state worker unions."
Makes sense? How does this make sense? Oh, I see. It is about savings and the need to be consistent with the other State worker unions. Childrens' education takes a back seat.
"The union and state could have prevented the loss of instructional days if they had scheduled furloughs on holidays and teacher planning days."
Now this makes sense!!
"Okabe added that most of a school's administrative or support staff are members of two other unions — the Hawaii Government Employee Association or the United Public Workers. If the HSTA had chosen a furlough day other than Friday, it would have made for a logistical nightmare, Okabe said."
Logistical nightmare versus our childrens' education. I would say that this is a no-brainer. I guess the HSTA president feels otherwise. We pay a lot of money for salaries of employees that are tasked with managing logistics. Nightmare? What about the fact that our children will be losing out? That's a nightmare.
"Marie Laderta, the state's chief negotiator, said the DOE did not have to schedule furloughs on instructional days. It could have opted for teacher pay cuts or made use of holidays, she said."
Then why did the State allow this to happen? Doesn't the State have to agree to the negotiated contract? Please stop the finger pointing, Ms. Laderta.
"Garrett Toguchi, chairman of the state Board of Education, said that the use of teacher planning days and professional development days were discussed, but ultimately those at the bargaining table decided against using them as furloughs."
Why??? Please tell us why!
"Toguchi said taking away the six noninstructional days from teachers would mean less time to plan curriculum and create strategies for boosting achievement."
Less time to plan curriculum and create strategies for 17 less days of instruction? Come on Mr. Toguchi. Do you really expect us to believe this?
" 'We demand a lot from our educators and put a lot of pressure on them to raise student achievement, raise test scores. ... Our educators need that time to get training, do planning and identify the needs of their students,' Toguchi said."
So are you saying that the way to raise student achievement and test scores is to reduce the number of instructional days for the students? Is that what you are saying? If so, please explain how you plan to do that.
"Okabe said the HSTA had considered using noninstructional days as furlough days, but those days would not have resulted in the kinds of cost savings that the state Department of Education was looking for."
So the HSTA and the Department of Education, who are tasked with educating the children of our State, have taken the position that cost savings is more important than education. This is quite evident by the quote of Mr. Okabe.
The actions of the leadership of this State is shameful. What is even more shameful is the lack of opposition from our legislators. Other than some meaningless comments, nothing is being done to address this very serious issue. Let's all band together and call for immediate action by our leaders. We must not let this happen to our children. Call your legislators, both local and State. Let them know how you feel. We don't have much time. Thank you.
Friday, September 25, 2009
Luggage Boycott Needed Immediately
According to a USA Today article this morning,
In the first six months of this year, the airlines collected $3.8 billion for checking bags, canceling or rebooking flights, carrying pets and assigning seats, the latest data from the Department of Transportation's Bureau of Transportation Statistics show. That's up from $2.3 billion for the first half of 2008.
That is $1.5 billion dollars more than the same period last year. And this is only for 6 months. Unbelievable. The article further states,
Checked-bag fees are the most lucrative source of extra money. Revenue from them was $669 million in April, May and June alone, up 276% over what they brought in the same time last year. In the first six months of the year, airlines collected $1.24 billion in baggage fees.
Okay ladies and gentlemen. It is time to take a stand. For the next 6 months, let's not check any bags through the airlines. Unless, of course, they are kind enough to allow checked bags at no cost. For all those carriers that insist on charging $10, $15, $20 and even $25 per bag, let's send them the message and reduce their ridiculous profits for the next 6 months. I think they need to realize that we don't deserve to be treated this way.
It is time for the passengers to have a voice. The airlines are becoming like the credit card companies. They prey on the very people that create their success. I think that it is disrespectful for airlines to do this to their customers, but as long we allow them, they will continue. Effective immediately, no more checked luggage. Hand carries only. For the next 6 months or until the airlines get the message. Safe travels.
In the first six months of this year, the airlines collected $3.8 billion for checking bags, canceling or rebooking flights, carrying pets and assigning seats, the latest data from the Department of Transportation's Bureau of Transportation Statistics show. That's up from $2.3 billion for the first half of 2008.
That is $1.5 billion dollars more than the same period last year. And this is only for 6 months. Unbelievable. The article further states,
Checked-bag fees are the most lucrative source of extra money. Revenue from them was $669 million in April, May and June alone, up 276% over what they brought in the same time last year. In the first six months of the year, airlines collected $1.24 billion in baggage fees.
Okay ladies and gentlemen. It is time to take a stand. For the next 6 months, let's not check any bags through the airlines. Unless, of course, they are kind enough to allow checked bags at no cost. For all those carriers that insist on charging $10, $15, $20 and even $25 per bag, let's send them the message and reduce their ridiculous profits for the next 6 months. I think they need to realize that we don't deserve to be treated this way.
It is time for the passengers to have a voice. The airlines are becoming like the credit card companies. They prey on the very people that create their success. I think that it is disrespectful for airlines to do this to their customers, but as long we allow them, they will continue. Effective immediately, no more checked luggage. Hand carries only. For the next 6 months or until the airlines get the message. Safe travels.
Thursday, September 24, 2009
Special Session for the Keiki?
I posed the following question to Senator Hooser on his Facebook page:
Senator, is the 17-day HSTA furlough a done deal? Is there a chance that it won't happen? I understand that the Governor has to approve the ratification. Is that true. Thank you.
His response was:
The furlough is a done deal unless additional funding can be secured. Our options seem to be limited to using most/all of the money now in the Hurricane fund or raising taxes. The only near term way that I can see to come up with the immediate funds needed to stop or reduce the furlough days would be a one day special session to transfer the hurricane money to education. Long term funding would then have to come from a tax increase or even more severe cuts to all other programs...including health and human services. What do you think the public would support? As most I hope know and understand, the legislature's role is limited with regards to collective bargaining and we were not involved in the negotiations or the final agreement at all.
I followed up with:
Is anyone proposing a special session? It seems to me that all options should be explored before the school year gets shortened. I question why the DOE doesn't use the waiver and planning days for the furloughs. This would not affect the kids as much. Just a thought.
He responded with:
A special session normally is not called unless there is pre-agreement between all parties and that includes governor. Do you think the public will support spending the Hurricane Fund to eliminate the teacher furlough days? That is probably the main question.
So the questions to all of you are:
Do you support spending the Hurricane Fund to eliminate the teacher furlough days?
Do you feel that all means have been exhausted and the last resort is to furlough the public school teachers?
I have set up a poll on the top of my blog. Please vote. Thank you.
Senator, is the 17-day HSTA furlough a done deal? Is there a chance that it won't happen? I understand that the Governor has to approve the ratification. Is that true. Thank you.
His response was:
The furlough is a done deal unless additional funding can be secured. Our options seem to be limited to using most/all of the money now in the Hurricane fund or raising taxes. The only near term way that I can see to come up with the immediate funds needed to stop or reduce the furlough days would be a one day special session to transfer the hurricane money to education. Long term funding would then have to come from a tax increase or even more severe cuts to all other programs...including health and human services. What do you think the public would support? As most I hope know and understand, the legislature's role is limited with regards to collective bargaining and we were not involved in the negotiations or the final agreement at all.
I followed up with:
Is anyone proposing a special session? It seems to me that all options should be explored before the school year gets shortened. I question why the DOE doesn't use the waiver and planning days for the furloughs. This would not affect the kids as much. Just a thought.
He responded with:
A special session normally is not called unless there is pre-agreement between all parties and that includes governor. Do you think the public will support spending the Hurricane Fund to eliminate the teacher furlough days? That is probably the main question.
So the questions to all of you are:
Do you support spending the Hurricane Fund to eliminate the teacher furlough days?
Do you feel that all means have been exhausted and the last resort is to furlough the public school teachers?
I have set up a poll on the top of my blog. Please vote. Thank you.
Wednesday, September 23, 2009
Education Neglect?
Hawaii teachers agree to 17 furlough days — a 7.9% loss in pay
- Honolulu Advertiser
Teachers' contract calls for 7.9 percent pay cut via furloughs
- Honolulu Star Bulletin
This is not an attack on any public school teacher in our state. I admire their work, and I appreciate all that they do for our children. They were put in a tough position yesterday and they did what they had to do. I do not blame the teachers. They were placed between a rock and a hard place. Thank you teachers for all that you do.
My feelings, however, towards the government leaders that have allowed this to happen is quite different. I simply cannot believe that this is even happening. I cannot believe that our state has reached the point that we are now making our children pay for the inefficiencies and irresponsible spending of their government. Are we that short-sighted that we cannot see the harm that this will bring? Are we that blind that we cannot see the impacts that this will have on our children? Come on leaders.
It baffles me how the state makes such a big deal about the mandatory attendance policies for students today. Of course, we must all comply with No Child Left Behind. There must be butts in seats for us to get credit. But, when the state gets in a bind, 17 days of school really is not important anymore. 17 days are a lot of classes. Think about it. That is equal to 3 full weeks, plus 2 more days of school. That is a lot of instructions that won't be given. That is a lot of pages that won't be read. That is a lot of guidance that won't be provided. How will these days be made up? They will have to be made up to meet the requirements. What happens to the seniors that need to "qualify" for graduation? I'm sure someone has figured this out.
What I have not seen yet is any opposition to this shameful act by any of our elected officials. If I missed any, I sincerely apologize. I was hoping to hear at least some opposition to this but as of this posting, I have not heard a thing. A lot has been posted on social networks, blogs and online newspapers, but nothing in the open public. Why? Am I to believe that this will be supported by all of our leaders? I sure hope not.
Next year is an election year. Please remember those that forgot about our children. They don't deserve to be in office. Harsh words? Damn right. This is a serious matter and we must hold our leaders accountable. Our children are our future. What is happening is not acceptable. No Child Left Behind? In Hawaii, it is All Children Left Behind! God help our children.
- Honolulu Advertiser
Teachers' contract calls for 7.9 percent pay cut via furloughs
- Honolulu Star Bulletin
This is not an attack on any public school teacher in our state. I admire their work, and I appreciate all that they do for our children. They were put in a tough position yesterday and they did what they had to do. I do not blame the teachers. They were placed between a rock and a hard place. Thank you teachers for all that you do.
My feelings, however, towards the government leaders that have allowed this to happen is quite different. I simply cannot believe that this is even happening. I cannot believe that our state has reached the point that we are now making our children pay for the inefficiencies and irresponsible spending of their government. Are we that short-sighted that we cannot see the harm that this will bring? Are we that blind that we cannot see the impacts that this will have on our children? Come on leaders.
It baffles me how the state makes such a big deal about the mandatory attendance policies for students today. Of course, we must all comply with No Child Left Behind. There must be butts in seats for us to get credit. But, when the state gets in a bind, 17 days of school really is not important anymore. 17 days are a lot of classes. Think about it. That is equal to 3 full weeks, plus 2 more days of school. That is a lot of instructions that won't be given. That is a lot of pages that won't be read. That is a lot of guidance that won't be provided. How will these days be made up? They will have to be made up to meet the requirements. What happens to the seniors that need to "qualify" for graduation? I'm sure someone has figured this out.
What I have not seen yet is any opposition to this shameful act by any of our elected officials. If I missed any, I sincerely apologize. I was hoping to hear at least some opposition to this but as of this posting, I have not heard a thing. A lot has been posted on social networks, blogs and online newspapers, but nothing in the open public. Why? Am I to believe that this will be supported by all of our leaders? I sure hope not.
Next year is an election year. Please remember those that forgot about our children. They don't deserve to be in office. Harsh words? Damn right. This is a serious matter and we must hold our leaders accountable. Our children are our future. What is happening is not acceptable. No Child Left Behind? In Hawaii, it is All Children Left Behind! God help our children.
Tuesday, September 22, 2009
Hawaii Businesses to be Hit With Soaring Unemployment Tax
From a Honolulu Advertiser article on September 18th:
"Hawai'i's employers will face a stunning jump in unemployment taxes next year, with the average amount paid per employee increasing to at least $1,040 annually from the $90 paid now. The state said the dramatic rise in rates will take effect in April and comes as Hawai'i's unemployment trust fund plunges toward insolvency. The state has been paying out more in jobless benefits than it collects in unemployment taxes because of the slumping economy and jump in unemployment."
Small business gets it again. This is one of the reasons why Hawaii is known as a "business unfriendly" state. This can be validated by an article on today's Pacific Business News website. The article states:
"Hawaii’s business tax climate slipped from last year, according to a Washington, D.C.-based tax research group. The Aloha State is near the middle when it comes to business climates, ranking 24th in the nation, down from 22nd last year."
It is simply not fair to keep laying it on small businesses. We are having a tough enough time keeping our doors open. Small business is the backbone of the American economy. Let's help them for once. Let's help bail out small businesses, who struggle on a daily basis. We don't have private jets and multi-million dollar salaries. We work hard in our respective businesses and try to hang on to our employees. Stop the assault on small business. Please!!
"Hawai'i's employers will face a stunning jump in unemployment taxes next year, with the average amount paid per employee increasing to at least $1,040 annually from the $90 paid now. The state said the dramatic rise in rates will take effect in April and comes as Hawai'i's unemployment trust fund plunges toward insolvency. The state has been paying out more in jobless benefits than it collects in unemployment taxes because of the slumping economy and jump in unemployment."
Small business gets it again. This is one of the reasons why Hawaii is known as a "business unfriendly" state. This can be validated by an article on today's Pacific Business News website. The article states:
"Hawaii’s business tax climate slipped from last year, according to a Washington, D.C.-based tax research group. The Aloha State is near the middle when it comes to business climates, ranking 24th in the nation, down from 22nd last year."
It is simply not fair to keep laying it on small businesses. We are having a tough enough time keeping our doors open. Small business is the backbone of the American economy. Let's help them for once. Let's help bail out small businesses, who struggle on a daily basis. We don't have private jets and multi-million dollar salaries. We work hard in our respective businesses and try to hang on to our employees. Stop the assault on small business. Please!!
Monday, September 21, 2009
Beware: Varroa Mite on the Move
I will never forget the feeling I had at a political forum last year when a gentleman asked me about my plans to address the varroa mite issue. I did not know what the varroa mite was, nor did I know what harm they posed. I responded, "I have no idea what a varroa mite is but I will speak to you after the forum to get more information." Well, after the forum I did speak with the individual and was educated about the threat of varroa mites. I was quite concerned and followed up our discussion with some independent research. What I found was pretty scary, and led me to introduce a Council resolution that urged the State to address the varroa mite problem.
As I was surfing the net this evening, I found the following on http://www.honoluluadvertiser.com/, Under Breaking News:
"Reseachers say varroa mite spread on Big Island is inevitable"
"In just over a year's time, the varroa mite, a parasite that kills honeybees, has spread from the Hilo Bay area north to Onomea and south to Pahala, researchers say.
And it is not a matter of if, but when, the mites will spread to West Hawaii, said Ethel Villalobos, an entomologist at the University of Hawaii's College of Tropical Agriculture and Human Resources.
Although it isn't known how quickly it will happen, Villalobos said it will because bees are naturally on the move seeking sources of pollen, and farmers and beekeepers often move hives, and can unknowingly move a colony infested with parasite."
"The bottom line is: Varroa mites have been all over the world and the mainland for the last 20 years, and it's substantially changed the way agriculture is done on the mainland. It will substantially change the way we do agriculture here," said Richard Johnson, owner of Onomea Orchards and president of the Hawaii Tropical Fruit Growers."
Remember when the coqui frog was brand new to Hawaii? Remember when we didn't think it warranted much attention? Well, the Big Island wishes they addressed the coqui frog back then. Today, the coqui frog is an uncontrollable menace on the Big Island. We must not allow the varroa mite to follow that same track. The varroa mite is much more destructive than the coqui frog. The varroa mite will affect agriculture, and the way we live.
So what next? We must make sure that stay on top of this issue. We must continue to ask our leaders to stay on top of this issue. This mite has to be stopped. And it has to be stopped at all costs.
As I was surfing the net this evening, I found the following on http://www.honoluluadvertiser.com/, Under Breaking News:
"Reseachers say varroa mite spread on Big Island is inevitable"
"In just over a year's time, the varroa mite, a parasite that kills honeybees, has spread from the Hilo Bay area north to Onomea and south to Pahala, researchers say.
And it is not a matter of if, but when, the mites will spread to West Hawaii, said Ethel Villalobos, an entomologist at the University of Hawaii's College of Tropical Agriculture and Human Resources.
Although it isn't known how quickly it will happen, Villalobos said it will because bees are naturally on the move seeking sources of pollen, and farmers and beekeepers often move hives, and can unknowingly move a colony infested with parasite."
"The bottom line is: Varroa mites have been all over the world and the mainland for the last 20 years, and it's substantially changed the way agriculture is done on the mainland. It will substantially change the way we do agriculture here," said Richard Johnson, owner of Onomea Orchards and president of the Hawaii Tropical Fruit Growers."
Remember when the coqui frog was brand new to Hawaii? Remember when we didn't think it warranted much attention? Well, the Big Island wishes they addressed the coqui frog back then. Today, the coqui frog is an uncontrollable menace on the Big Island. We must not allow the varroa mite to follow that same track. The varroa mite is much more destructive than the coqui frog. The varroa mite will affect agriculture, and the way we live.
So what next? We must make sure that stay on top of this issue. We must continue to ask our leaders to stay on top of this issue. This mite has to be stopped. And it has to be stopped at all costs.
Friday, September 18, 2009
Airline Change Fees Can Be Dangerous
I was not going to blog on this topic but last night, I heard a story from someone that tried to cancel her flight because of a very bad flu. When she called the airlines to cancel her reservation, they informed her that she would be charged a $175 change fee when she re-scheduled. She can't afford the $175 so she decided to fly on her scheduled flight, possibly infecting hundreds of passengers. This is very dangerous. I can't believe how greedy these airlines can be. According to and airlines spokesperson, they have no plans to change the policies at this time.
Why are they so money hungry? They charge us for every little thing, their fares are skyrocketing, and their service has not improved any over the years. In fact, I have noticed in my recent travels that the service has diminished quite a bit. Something has got to be done. Passengers should be protected from these vultures out to make a lot of money. I can see charging passengers for overweight bags, but they need to be practical. Their recent policy changes regarding fees for your first bag is crazy. It has forced people into taking very large carryon luggage, whish slows down the boarding process. It is simply ridiculous.
The change fee is of most concern. If people will be travelling sick because they cannot afford the change fees, the spread of the H1N1 virus will get worse. I cannot understand how difficult it would be to waive all fees in cases of illness, injury or personal tradegy. This problem will only get worse as airlines try to make up their financial losses on the backs of their customers. I hope this changes soon.
Why are they so money hungry? They charge us for every little thing, their fares are skyrocketing, and their service has not improved any over the years. In fact, I have noticed in my recent travels that the service has diminished quite a bit. Something has got to be done. Passengers should be protected from these vultures out to make a lot of money. I can see charging passengers for overweight bags, but they need to be practical. Their recent policy changes regarding fees for your first bag is crazy. It has forced people into taking very large carryon luggage, whish slows down the boarding process. It is simply ridiculous.
The change fee is of most concern. If people will be travelling sick because they cannot afford the change fees, the spread of the H1N1 virus will get worse. I cannot understand how difficult it would be to waive all fees in cases of illness, injury or personal tradegy. This problem will only get worse as airlines try to make up their financial losses on the backs of their customers. I hope this changes soon.
Wednesday, September 16, 2009
Bad Economy, Even in Minnesota
As I was preparing to post a new topic tonight, I happened to hear the local newscaster talk about budget cuts here in Minnesota. The Minneapolis Police Department disbanded their narcotics enforcement unit today, saving the county 5 million dollars. Approximately 50 positions were lost, and this comes after significant cuts in their auto fleet and community service divisions. Can you believe that? Wow. This is the first major police department in the country without a narcotics enforcement unit.
No jurisdiction is immune to the poor economy. I guess I am surprised that Minneapolis decided to compromise public safety in their budget reductions. We should be thankful that Kauai County has not jeapordized public safety while trying to trim the budget. The public here is not happy with this decision, although the Chief has stated that the war on drugs will continue. The narcotics unit investigated 4000 drug cases last year. I'm not sure who will work on these drug cases without the unit. Oh well, lucky we live Hawaii.
I just hope this action by Minneapolis will not start a trend throughout the country. Drug enforcement is vital to public safety, especially when history tells us that drug use increases during tough economies. We will have to see the results of this very bold budget move.
No jurisdiction is immune to the poor economy. I guess I am surprised that Minneapolis decided to compromise public safety in their budget reductions. We should be thankful that Kauai County has not jeapordized public safety while trying to trim the budget. The public here is not happy with this decision, although the Chief has stated that the war on drugs will continue. The narcotics unit investigated 4000 drug cases last year. I'm not sure who will work on these drug cases without the unit. Oh well, lucky we live Hawaii.
I just hope this action by Minneapolis will not start a trend throughout the country. Drug enforcement is vital to public safety, especially when history tells us that drug use increases during tough economies. We will have to see the results of this very bold budget move.
Tuesday, September 15, 2009
Football is Finally Here
Well, the time has finally come. It is football season once again. Pop Warner, High School, College and the NFL. It doesn't matter what level, football is a great sport to watch. Boy, I thought football was big in Hawaii. Minnesota is football country. Whether it is the University of Minnesota Golden Gophers or the Minnesota Vikings, these people love their football. It is a shame that the Vikings' first two games are away. I would really like to have watched them play. They play in Detroit this week (Go Jordan) and will be back here to play the 49ers next week. If we are still here, I will watch that game. I'm not much of a Brett Favre fan but Adrian Peterson is an animal. He is simply amazing.
High school football on Kauai will be interesting this year. It appears that Kapaa has it together and Waimea has yet to be seen. I gotta cheer for my alma mater, Kauai High School. It's a lot different watching when your son isn't playing.
College football. Now this will be interesting. My son is a freshman at UNLV. Hawaii is at UNLV this week. Who do I cheer for? Well, I like the Warriors but I think that the Rebels will win the game by a pretty large margin. Hawaii has a lot of work to do, and I don't think that they are ready to face the Rebels yet. Overall, I think USC will be the national champs this year. They are superb.
Why am I discussing football on this blog? Because I love football and it sparks discussions. Just like politics, everyone has opinions on football. This is a great place to air them out. Your thoughts?
High school football on Kauai will be interesting this year. It appears that Kapaa has it together and Waimea has yet to be seen. I gotta cheer for my alma mater, Kauai High School. It's a lot different watching when your son isn't playing.
College football. Now this will be interesting. My son is a freshman at UNLV. Hawaii is at UNLV this week. Who do I cheer for? Well, I like the Warriors but I think that the Rebels will win the game by a pretty large margin. Hawaii has a lot of work to do, and I don't think that they are ready to face the Rebels yet. Overall, I think USC will be the national champs this year. They are superb.
Why am I discussing football on this blog? Because I love football and it sparks discussions. Just like politics, everyone has opinions on football. This is a great place to air them out. Your thoughts?
Monday, September 14, 2009
Chapter 205-5 of the Hawaii Revised Statutes
This seems like deja vu but to clear up any misconceptions regarding the State law, I have decided to post the State law for all to see. My position is simply this:
The County Council is not the vehicle to allow overnight accomodations on ag land. The State law needs to be changed. The County Council, if they want to see this changed, should be introducing a resolution requesting the State Legislature consider changing the law. To try and get around a State law with a County ordinance is very dangerous, and invites litigation.
This Council should be working on an ag tourism ordinance, as authorized in the Hawaii Revised Statutes. This is the appropriate vehicle that the State law allows the counties to pursue. I'm not sure why this option is not being pursued.
§205-5 Zoning.
(a) Except as herein provided, the powers granted to counties under section 46-4 shall govern the zoning within the districts, other than in conservation districts. Conservation districts shall be governed by the department of land and natural resources pursuant to chapter 183C.
(b) Within agricultural districts, uses compatible to the activities described in section 205‑2 as determined by the commission shall be permitted; provided that accessory agricultural uses and services described in sections 205‑2 and 205‑4.5 may be further defined by each county by zoning ordinance. Each county shall adopt ordinances setting forth procedures and requirements, including provisions for enforcement, penalties, and administrative oversight, for the review and permitting of agricultural tourism uses and activities as an accessory use on a working farm, or farming operation as defined in section 165‑2; provided that agricultural tourism activities shall not be permissible in the absence of a bona fide farming operation. Ordinances shall include but not be limited to:
(1) Requirements for access to a farm, including road width, road surface, and parking;
(2) Requirements and restrictions for accessory facilities connected with the farming operation, including gift shops and restaurants; provided that overnight accommodations shall not be permitted;
(3) Activities that may be offered by the farming operation for visitors;
(4) Days and hours of operation; and
(5) Automatic termination of the accessory use upon the cessation of the farming operation.
Each county may require an environmental assessment under chapter 343 as a condition to any agricultural tourism use and activity. Other uses may be allowed by special permits issued pursuant to this chapter. The minimum lot size in agricultural districts shall be determined by each county by zoning ordinance, subdivision ordinance, or other lawful means; provided that the minimum lot size for any agricultural use shall not be less than one acre, except as provided herein. If the county finds that unreasonable economic hardship to the owner or lessee of land cannot otherwise be prevented or where land utilization is improved, the county may allow lot sizes of less than the minimum lot size as specified by law for lots created by a consolidation of existing lots within an agricultural district and the resubdivision thereof; provided that the consolidation and resubdivision do not result in an increase in the number of lots over the number existing prior to consolidation; and provided further that in no event shall a lot which is equal to or exceeds the minimum lot size of one acre be less than that minimum after the consolidation and resubdivision action. The county may also allow lot sizes of less than the minimum lot size as specified by law for lots created or used for plantation community subdivisions as defined in section 205-4.5(a)(12), for public, private, and quasi-public utility purposes, and for lots resulting from the subdivision of abandoned roadways and railroad easements.
(c) Unless authorized by special permit issued pursuant to this chapter, only the following uses shall be permitted within rural districts:
(1) Low density residential uses;
(2) Agricultural uses;
(3) Golf courses, golf driving ranges, and golf-related facilities; and
(4) Public, quasi-public, and public utility facilities.
In addition, the minimum lot size for any low density residential use shall be one-half acre and there shall be but one dwelling house per one-half acre, except as provided for in section 205-2. [L 1963, c 205, pt of §2; Supp, §98H-5; HRS §205-5; am L 1969, c 232, §1; am L 1977, c 140, §2; am L 1978, c 165, §1; am L 1991, c 281, §4; am L 1994, c 270, §2; am L 2005, c 205, §4; am L 2006, c 237, §5 and c 250, §3]
The County Council is not the vehicle to allow overnight accomodations on ag land. The State law needs to be changed. The County Council, if they want to see this changed, should be introducing a resolution requesting the State Legislature consider changing the law. To try and get around a State law with a County ordinance is very dangerous, and invites litigation.
This Council should be working on an ag tourism ordinance, as authorized in the Hawaii Revised Statutes. This is the appropriate vehicle that the State law allows the counties to pursue. I'm not sure why this option is not being pursued.
§205-5 Zoning.
(a) Except as herein provided, the powers granted to counties under section 46-4 shall govern the zoning within the districts, other than in conservation districts. Conservation districts shall be governed by the department of land and natural resources pursuant to chapter 183C.
(b) Within agricultural districts, uses compatible to the activities described in section 205‑2 as determined by the commission shall be permitted; provided that accessory agricultural uses and services described in sections 205‑2 and 205‑4.5 may be further defined by each county by zoning ordinance. Each county shall adopt ordinances setting forth procedures and requirements, including provisions for enforcement, penalties, and administrative oversight, for the review and permitting of agricultural tourism uses and activities as an accessory use on a working farm, or farming operation as defined in section 165‑2; provided that agricultural tourism activities shall not be permissible in the absence of a bona fide farming operation. Ordinances shall include but not be limited to:
(1) Requirements for access to a farm, including road width, road surface, and parking;
(2) Requirements and restrictions for accessory facilities connected with the farming operation, including gift shops and restaurants; provided that overnight accommodations shall not be permitted;
(3) Activities that may be offered by the farming operation for visitors;
(4) Days and hours of operation; and
(5) Automatic termination of the accessory use upon the cessation of the farming operation.
Each county may require an environmental assessment under chapter 343 as a condition to any agricultural tourism use and activity. Other uses may be allowed by special permits issued pursuant to this chapter. The minimum lot size in agricultural districts shall be determined by each county by zoning ordinance, subdivision ordinance, or other lawful means; provided that the minimum lot size for any agricultural use shall not be less than one acre, except as provided herein. If the county finds that unreasonable economic hardship to the owner or lessee of land cannot otherwise be prevented or where land utilization is improved, the county may allow lot sizes of less than the minimum lot size as specified by law for lots created by a consolidation of existing lots within an agricultural district and the resubdivision thereof; provided that the consolidation and resubdivision do not result in an increase in the number of lots over the number existing prior to consolidation; and provided further that in no event shall a lot which is equal to or exceeds the minimum lot size of one acre be less than that minimum after the consolidation and resubdivision action. The county may also allow lot sizes of less than the minimum lot size as specified by law for lots created or used for plantation community subdivisions as defined in section 205-4.5(a)(12), for public, private, and quasi-public utility purposes, and for lots resulting from the subdivision of abandoned roadways and railroad easements.
(c) Unless authorized by special permit issued pursuant to this chapter, only the following uses shall be permitted within rural districts:
(1) Low density residential uses;
(2) Agricultural uses;
(3) Golf courses, golf driving ranges, and golf-related facilities; and
(4) Public, quasi-public, and public utility facilities.
In addition, the minimum lot size for any low density residential use shall be one-half acre and there shall be but one dwelling house per one-half acre, except as provided for in section 205-2. [L 1963, c 205, pt of §2; Supp, §98H-5; HRS §205-5; am L 1969, c 232, §1; am L 1977, c 140, §2; am L 1978, c 165, §1; am L 1991, c 281, §4; am L 1994, c 270, §2; am L 2005, c 205, §4; am L 2006, c 237, §5 and c 250, §3]
Saturday, September 12, 2009
Vacation Rentals on Ag Land?
I apologize for the late post but I have been on airplanes and in airports since yesterday at noon. Flight delays on Oahu and in San Francisco made my trip to Minnesota a living hell. It took 26 hours from the time I left Kauai until I could check into my hotel. Oh well.....
On Wednesday, the Planning Committee of the Council will hear Bill 2298. This bill would allow vacation rentals on ag lands located on Kauai. As many of you know, I am totally against this for one reason. It is prohibited by State law. Why the Council continues to entertain this bill is beyond me. Please contact your Councilmembers and ask them to kill this bill. We are at crossroads right now, and this bill could really destroy the Kauai as we know it. This bill cannot pass.
Take a look around. Planning Department trying to allow unregistered vacation rentals outside of the VDA. Unlawful structures being permitted. Shoreline certifications being waived in the interest of rich landowners. Council considering legalizing an illegal activity. TVRs on ag land are illegal. Why are we doing these things? Why are we not fighting for the PEOPLE OF KAUAI? Why so much effort to assist the transplants at the expense of our LOCAL PEOPLE? Let's try to help the local people for once. You know, the guy that wants to build an extension but gets hammered along the way? The guy that wants to build a family room for a homeless family member but gets denied right out of the chute. What about the local residents that have been told, for decades, that vacation rentals are illegal on ag land so they never rented out their homes as vacation rentals. THEY FOLLOWED THE LAW and now are being punished because they were law abiding citizens. The transplants that disregarded the laws are now allowed to continue the illegal operations. Come on County, WAKE UP!!!
I'm sorry for the tone but this issue drives me crazy. If Kauai wants vacation rentals on ag land, then we need to lobby our State legislators to change the State law. We are entering very dangerous waters when the County is trying to undermine State law (like they are trying to do with the shoreline protection waiver bill as well) to satisfy special interests. This is just WRONG! Let's stop this now. Thank you.
On Wednesday, the Planning Committee of the Council will hear Bill 2298. This bill would allow vacation rentals on ag lands located on Kauai. As many of you know, I am totally against this for one reason. It is prohibited by State law. Why the Council continues to entertain this bill is beyond me. Please contact your Councilmembers and ask them to kill this bill. We are at crossroads right now, and this bill could really destroy the Kauai as we know it. This bill cannot pass.
Take a look around. Planning Department trying to allow unregistered vacation rentals outside of the VDA. Unlawful structures being permitted. Shoreline certifications being waived in the interest of rich landowners. Council considering legalizing an illegal activity. TVRs on ag land are illegal. Why are we doing these things? Why are we not fighting for the PEOPLE OF KAUAI? Why so much effort to assist the transplants at the expense of our LOCAL PEOPLE? Let's try to help the local people for once. You know, the guy that wants to build an extension but gets hammered along the way? The guy that wants to build a family room for a homeless family member but gets denied right out of the chute. What about the local residents that have been told, for decades, that vacation rentals are illegal on ag land so they never rented out their homes as vacation rentals. THEY FOLLOWED THE LAW and now are being punished because they were law abiding citizens. The transplants that disregarded the laws are now allowed to continue the illegal operations. Come on County, WAKE UP!!!
I'm sorry for the tone but this issue drives me crazy. If Kauai wants vacation rentals on ag land, then we need to lobby our State legislators to change the State law. We are entering very dangerous waters when the County is trying to undermine State law (like they are trying to do with the shoreline protection waiver bill as well) to satisfy special interests. This is just WRONG! Let's stop this now. Thank you.
Thursday, September 10, 2009
Bike Path Across Wailua Beach
Wow. I cannot believe what is happening right now. The County is determined to build a bike path across OUR Wailua Beach. Wailua Beach is sacred. Wailua Beach should not be touched. Wailua Beach should not be destroyed. PERIOD!!
For years, I have been questioning the placement of the bike path (among other things). I have been criticized for being so vocal in my quest to get my questions answered. I have been labeled "Mr. Oppose-O" and "Mr. Anti Bike Path." It is quite interesting how many of my critics are now opposing the bike path being built across Wailua Beach. You see, I don't oppose the bike path at all. In fact, I think it is a good thing. What I do oppose is the fact many shortcuts were taken. This project was destined to be completed, regardless of what the people wanted. Remember Wailua Houselots? Papaloa Road? And now, Wailua Beach?
I stand firm in opposition of any construction along our beaches of Kauai, especially Wailua Beach. Beaches are becoming more and more difficult to find. As you know, many of the northshore beaches have been lost due to construction and erosion. Kekaha is losing beaches as we speak because of construction. We cannot let this continue to happen. Beaches and shorelines must be protected. We have State laws that mandate that. We cannot continue to allow the destruction on our natural resources. Enough is enough.
I'm curious to see what happens with Wailua Beach. The right thing to do is to build the path mauka, behind Coco Palms. It is a beautiful route that will allow the preservation of OUR Wailua Beach. Your thoughts?
For years, I have been questioning the placement of the bike path (among other things). I have been criticized for being so vocal in my quest to get my questions answered. I have been labeled "Mr. Oppose-O" and "Mr. Anti Bike Path." It is quite interesting how many of my critics are now opposing the bike path being built across Wailua Beach. You see, I don't oppose the bike path at all. In fact, I think it is a good thing. What I do oppose is the fact many shortcuts were taken. This project was destined to be completed, regardless of what the people wanted. Remember Wailua Houselots? Papaloa Road? And now, Wailua Beach?
I stand firm in opposition of any construction along our beaches of Kauai, especially Wailua Beach. Beaches are becoming more and more difficult to find. As you know, many of the northshore beaches have been lost due to construction and erosion. Kekaha is losing beaches as we speak because of construction. We cannot let this continue to happen. Beaches and shorelines must be protected. We have State laws that mandate that. We cannot continue to allow the destruction on our natural resources. Enough is enough.
I'm curious to see what happens with Wailua Beach. The right thing to do is to build the path mauka, behind Coco Palms. It is a beautiful route that will allow the preservation of OUR Wailua Beach. Your thoughts?
Wednesday, September 9, 2009
Landfill Selection
Well, congratulations to Mayor Carvalho for making the tough decision to site the new landfill. He promised it in his campaign and he delivered. Many will disagree with the location, but he went along with the committee that was set up to review the options. I have not reviewed all the minutes of the committee meetings but I'm sure they had a lot of discussions over this very tough issue. The Mayor did something that prior Mayors did not have the guts to do. I sincerely appreciate his bold decision to move forward.
Personally, I would have preferred the location up in the area of Wailua Falls, on Ma'alo Road. It is out of the way, near the Kauai Power Plant, and would not affect any existing agricultural operations. Again, I have not reviewed any of the minutes of the committee meetings. I am basing my opinion strictly on information that I had obtained during my 6 years on the Council. Back then, Grove Farm (owner of the Ma'alo Road property) was a willing partner and A&B Properties (owner of the proposed site) was not. I'm not sure if things have changed any but I am very curious to see how this pans out.
It now moves to the Council for discussion. As we roll into an election year, it will be interesting to see how the councilmembers take on this issue. Will a decision be made in an election year? I hope so. This issue has been ignored for too long. Now is the time to move and start the process of building a new landfill.
Personally, I would have preferred the location up in the area of Wailua Falls, on Ma'alo Road. It is out of the way, near the Kauai Power Plant, and would not affect any existing agricultural operations. Again, I have not reviewed any of the minutes of the committee meetings. I am basing my opinion strictly on information that I had obtained during my 6 years on the Council. Back then, Grove Farm (owner of the Ma'alo Road property) was a willing partner and A&B Properties (owner of the proposed site) was not. I'm not sure if things have changed any but I am very curious to see how this pans out.
It now moves to the Council for discussion. As we roll into an election year, it will be interesting to see how the councilmembers take on this issue. Will a decision be made in an election year? I hope so. This issue has been ignored for too long. Now is the time to move and start the process of building a new landfill.
Monday, September 7, 2009
Planning or Permitting Department?
This is a great topic to kick off "Straight From The Heart." And the timing couldn't be better. Transient vacation rentals in non-VDA or on agriculture lands, shoreline certification waivers, approvals of non-compliant structures, flagrant disregard of state and local laws, etc. Is our Planning Department truly planning Kauai's future or simply just permitting the majority of applications that come through.
During my 6 years on the County Council, I constantly battled with the Planning Department for answers to simple questions that the people had. Questions like:
Why is this happening? Is it the pressure put on by high-pressure attorneys? Is it the false belief that these unlawful structures and uses actually stimulate the economy? Whatever it is, it has to stop. Laws are in place to protect our precious resources, mainly the coastlines and beaches of Kauai. This County continues to ignore these laws and the people suffer. The beaches in Hawaii are limited. Once gone, they cannot be replaced. I can't seem to get that through the heads of our Planning Department leaders, or our Planning Commissioners. Caren Diamond and Barbara Robeson have done extensive investigations in this area and they have more than enough evidence to prove that mistakes have been made. They continue their fight and I stand behind them. I will continue to fight until we win. I am told that certain Federal agencies are now looking into this matter. Hooray! I am hopeful that they will make some headway on Kauai. This has to stop soon. Hopefully this blog can be of assistance in the fight to clean up the mess that has occurred. I can only hope.
I am excited for this opportunity to share my concerns. I look forward to a healthy discussion and possible solutions to this very serious problem. Let's hear from you.
During my 6 years on the County Council, I constantly battled with the Planning Department for answers to simple questions that the people had. Questions like:
- Which law allows the Planning Department to waive shoreline certifications?
- Which law authorizes the Planning Department to permit unlawful structures?
- How can the County Planning Department ignore the State laws that mandate the protection of the Special Management Areas?
- How can the County Planning Department ignore the State laws that prohibit TVRs on agricultural lands?
Why is this happening? Is it the pressure put on by high-pressure attorneys? Is it the false belief that these unlawful structures and uses actually stimulate the economy? Whatever it is, it has to stop. Laws are in place to protect our precious resources, mainly the coastlines and beaches of Kauai. This County continues to ignore these laws and the people suffer. The beaches in Hawaii are limited. Once gone, they cannot be replaced. I can't seem to get that through the heads of our Planning Department leaders, or our Planning Commissioners. Caren Diamond and Barbara Robeson have done extensive investigations in this area and they have more than enough evidence to prove that mistakes have been made. They continue their fight and I stand behind them. I will continue to fight until we win. I am told that certain Federal agencies are now looking into this matter. Hooray! I am hopeful that they will make some headway on Kauai. This has to stop soon. Hopefully this blog can be of assistance in the fight to clean up the mess that has occurred. I can only hope.
I am excited for this opportunity to share my concerns. I look forward to a healthy discussion and possible solutions to this very serious problem. Let's hear from you.
Friday, September 4, 2009
Looking for Input
I just realized that I did not have this blog set up for anonymous posts. I have fixed that so I will wait until next Monday to gather your suggestions on what topic should be the inaugural one. There is no shortage of issues. The economy, layoffs, furloughs, the environment, politics, etc. I want the first one to be a good one. I also want everyone to have the opportunity to chime in and post comments. I am hopeful that in a very short time, this blog will be one of the most popular on Kauai. Until next time, take care.
Thursday, September 3, 2009
Welcome Everyone
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)